An open problem we'll discuss on this page is the following:
Problem (Literka). Let {} be a sequence of real numbers such that
Let us consider
numbers of the form
(We take all possible of sums of elements with plus or minus signs).
Show that among them there are at least
numbers such that
(Having absolute value smaller or equal 1).
Notice: Numbers corresponding to different sequences of signs we regard as distinct, although they may have equal values.
In other words: we count also multiplicity of occuring numbers.
'Literka' will formulate this problem in a different way to avoid a possibility of misunderstanding:
Problem (Literka). Let {} be a sequence of real numbers such that the sum of squares of elements is equal 1.
Take the first number of this sequence with a sign '+' or with a sign '-'. Hence - we have 2
possibilities. To each of obtained 2 numbers add or subtract second number of the sequence.
We'll have 4 numbers created that way. To each of them add or subtract third number .. etc.
After the final step we'll have numbers.
Show that an absolute value of at least half of them is smaller or equal 1.
This problem was published by 'Literka' many years ago and still it is an open problem. This is a vicious problem, since sometimes it looks to be easy, many times it looks to be solved by a mathematician, who later realizes that he made a terrible mistake (unfortunately this also includes 'Literka').
This problem can be reformulated the following way:
Problem (Literka). Let {} be a sequence of real numbers such that
and take any number x>0.
Let M be a set of all numbers of the form
such that Let N be a set of all numbers of the form
such that
Show that M has at least so many elements as N.
(Counting multiplicity of occuring elements).
All these 3 versions of a problem of 'Literka' are equivalent, although the last version looks to be stronger than others.
There are known and proved weaker forms of this problem. One of them was proved by 'Literka' and it is exactly a solution of a problem in the case that all numbers of a sequence are equal. In that case they are equal
Theorem. (Literka) Let {} be a sequence of real numbers, all of them equal
Let x>0 be a real number.
Let M be a set of all numbers of the form
such that Let N be a set of all numbers of the form
such that
Then M has at least so many elements as N.
(Counting multiplicity of occuring elements).
The problem and theorem of 'Literka' can be written in terms of probability.
We say that a sequence of random variables
is a Bernoulli sequence of independent random variables if all
are independent and for each i we have
Problem (Literka). Let
} be a Bernoulli sequence of independent random variables. Let {
} be a sequence of real numbers such that
Let us define
Prove that
As before this problem can be reformulated in a seemingly stronger form:
Problem (Literka). Let
} be a Bernoulli sequence of independent random variables. Let {
} be a sequence of real numbers such that
and x>0 be a real number.
Let us define
Prove that
A partial result obtained by 'Literka' is the following:
Theorem (Literka). Let
} be a Bernoulli sequence of independent random variables. Let {
} be a sequence of real numbers all of them equal
Let x>0 be a real number.
Let us define
Then
For those, who do not like hard and unsolved problems, 'Literka' also has something.
Take x from the third version of the problem to be less than the sum of all elements. Then the the set N is non-empty.
If problem is true, then the set M must be non-empty. We conclude the following:
Remark (Literka). Let {
} be a sequence of real numbers such that
Then there exists a sequence of signs
(i.e. sequence of numbers equal 1 or -1) such that
'Literka' is sure that you can easily prove it.
Remark. Mr. Daniel Kim Murphy, who is a math student of MIT, wrote Literka about partial results of this problem.
Weaker inequality was proved by Professor Daniel Kleitman and Professor Ron Holzman
(see "Combinatorica" 1992 (volume 2) page 303 ). They proved the conjecture with a constant 3/8 instead of 1/2.